<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BBC Confirms 6Music to be axed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forfolkssake.com/news/3709/bbc-6-confirms-6-music-to-be-axed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forfolkssake.com/news/3709/bbc-6-confirms-6-music-to-be-axed</link>
	<description>New Folk Music News, Reviews, Interviews, Recommendations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 15:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: olly miller</title>
		<link>http://www.forfolkssake.com/news/3709/bbc-6-confirms-6-music-to-be-axed/comment-page-1#comment-361</link>
		<dc:creator>olly miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forfolkssake.com/?p=3709#comment-361</guid>
		<description>I remember an ad campaign a few years ago stating that the BBC is unique&quot;because the way it is funded&quot; i.e.tax.

You now have mark thompson saying that 6 music should be cancelled because it does not have listeners. 6 music started 8 years ago. BBC3 started 40 years ago. How do the listenning figures compare? I think that 6music is doing pretty well, comparably. I could be cynical and comment on the fact the the man making this decision is in his 60&#039;s and not likely to be  a 6Music listener (I guarantee he is not). I am sure he will say he does listen,(as an enjoyer) but he is lying.

As far as i am concerned you (BBC)may as well scrap the license fee(which I once valued) and become a commercial  corporation, with adverts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember an ad campaign a few years ago stating that the BBC is unique&#8221;because the way it is funded&#8221; i.e.tax.</p>
<p>You now have mark thompson saying that 6 music should be cancelled because it does not have listeners. 6 music started 8 years ago. BBC3 started 40 years ago. How do the listenning figures compare? I think that 6music is doing pretty well, comparably. I could be cynical and comment on the fact the the man making this decision is in his 60&#8242;s and not likely to be  a 6Music listener (I guarantee he is not). I am sure he will say he does listen,(as an enjoyer) but he is lying.</p>
<p>As far as i am concerned you (BBC)may as well scrap the license fee(which I once valued) and become a commercial  corporation, with adverts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.forfolkssake.com/news/3709/bbc-6-confirms-6-music-to-be-axed/comment-page-1#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forfolkssake.com/?p=3709#comment-336</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m gutted- we all are. I will be writing to the trustees but I am going to take some time to sit down and write a properly researched letter in the hope that it won&#039;t fall on deaf ears. This feels like madness and a very poorly justified decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m gutted- we all are. I will be writing to the trustees but I am going to take some time to sit down and write a properly researched letter in the hope that it won&#8217;t fall on deaf ears. This feels like madness and a very poorly justified decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

